URLs, it’s about knowing what actually got indexed. IndexPlease runs daily monitoring checks on every submitted URL. It tells you:
All this happens automatically, no need to manually audit your site or dig through Search Console.
This gives SEOs and site managers full visibility and control over their indexing pipeline, something Google Search Console doesn’t do natively at scale.
URLMonitor ’s core strength is monitoring. It tracks each URL’s live indexing status via Google Search Console and flags any drops or indexing failures. The system sends instant alerts via email or Slack when a URL becomes unindexed. However, it does not provide error-specific diagnostics like soft 404s or canonical issues, it reports the status, not the cause. Its dashboard shows real-time index coverage but lacks deeper troubleshooting layers.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Daily Indexing Status Checks | ✓ | ✓ |
Error Detection (Soft 404s, Canonicals) | ✓ | ✘ |
Pending vs Indexed Breakdown | ✓ | ✓ (status only, no crawl insight) |
Automated Alerts or Logs | ✓ | ✓ (email/Slack) |
Ideal For | Agencies, content publishers, affiliate SEOs | SEOs needing live index alerts and coverage tracking |
With IndexPlease, indexing becomes a trackable, reliable process, not a mystery. URLMonitor alerts you when something breaks, but doesn’t show you how to fix it.
Submitting your sitemap to Google once isn’t enough. IndexPlease automates this task daily, ensuring that all your updated URLs, including new pages, edits and deletions, are captured in real-time.
It connects directly with Google Search Console’s API, pushing your sitemap every 24 hours. This keeps your sitemap clean, current and fully in sync with what Google expects, without you lifting a finger.
This daily automation prevents issues like stale URLs, broken entries or missed updates, all of which can slow down indexing.
URLMonitor does not submit sitemaps. Instead, it monitors URLs that are already submitted to GSC, whether individually or via sitemap. If indexing issues are detected (e.g. status drops or non-inclusion), you’ll receive real-time alerts. However, URLMonitor does not interact with the sitemap submission process or update your sitemap automatically. It’s an index status watchdog, not a sitemap automation tool.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Daily GSC Sitemap Submission | ✓ | ✘ |
GSC API Integration | ✓ | ✓ |
Manual Upload Needed | ✘ | ✘ |
Real-Time Sitemap Syncing | ✓ | ✘ (status tracking only) |
Ideal For | Growing sites with frequent updates | Cross-engine publishing setups |
IndexPlease ensures Google sees the latest version of your site daily.
URLMonitor tells you when Google stops noticing, but won’t resubmit anything for you.
Every indexed, pending or errored URL in your account is stored and made available as a downloadable .txt file. With a single click, you can export lists of:
This feature is especially valuable for agencies, developers and SEO teams who need clean URL data for audits, reporting or backup. It also streamlines integrations with other tools like Screaming Frog, GSC bulk uploads or analytics platforms.
URLMonitor provides live dashboard access to all URL statuses, but it does not offer downloadable .txt or CSV exports. You can view which URLs are indexed or have dropped, but there’s no one-click export feature for offline audits, client reports or third-party integrations. Users can manually copy data or use API workarounds, but structured exports are not natively supported.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Downloadable URL Logs (TXT) | ✓ | ✘ |
Export by Status (Indexed / Pending / Error) | ✓ | ✘ |
Ideal For SEO Reporting & QA | ✓ | ✘ |
Developer-Ready Format | ✓ | ✘ |
Ideal For | Agencies, data analysts, multi-site managers | SEOs tracking live status via dashboard/API only |
IndexPlease lets you export everything you monitor.
URLMonitor lets you monitor, but not download, your data.
Unlike most indexing tools that treat your account as a single project, IndexPlease lets you smartly divide your daily indexing quota across multiple websites.
Whether you’re managing:
You can allocate how much of your indexing capacity goes to each domain, manually or dynamically. That means your high-priority sites always get more indexing coverage, while smaller or seasonal domains use less.
URLMonitor supports tracking for unlimited URLs depending on your plan, but it does not provide quota allocation or indexing power per site, because it does not index URLs directly. It monitors what’s happening after submission, not how much gets submitted. You can add multiple domains and group URLs by project, but control over indexing volume per site does not apply.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Multi-Site Indexing Support | ✓ | ✓ (monitoring only) |
Smart Quota Distribution | ✓ | ✘ |
Manual Allocation by Project | ✓ | ✘ |
Dashboard for All Sites | ✓ | ✓ (for status only) |
Ideal For | SEO agencies, affiliate marketers, teams | Site owners tracking visibility across projects |
IndexPlease empowers you to scale indexing strategically.
URLMonitor tracks visibility, but not indexing volume or distribution.
Need to index hundreds or even thousands of URLs at once? IndexPlease makes it effortless. With its Bulk Indexing feature, you can upload entire lists of URLs and submit them in a single batch, no limits, no API rate restrictions.
It’s built for real SEO workflows like:
Bulk submission is handled directly through Google’s Indexing API, ensuring speed and success tracking.
URLMonitor does not provide bulk indexing or submission functionality. It tracks which URLs are indexed and alerts you when pages drop from Google’s index, but it has no submission system at all. Users can monitor large batches of URLs by uploading them into projects, but they cannot push or resubmit them for indexing. It’s purely a post-indexing monitoring tool, not a submission engine.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Unlimited Bulk URL Submissions | ✓ | ✘ |
Google API-based Bulk Handling | ✓ | ✓ |
Upload via CSV / List Input | ✓ | ✓ (for tracking only) |
Ideal Use Cases | Migrations, large content drops, audits | Monitoring large projects after submission |
Ideal For | Enterprise SEOs, agencies, content teams | SEOs needing alerts, not control |
IndexPlease helps you move fast at scale.
URLMonitor helps you react, after the fact.
Your sitemap should reflect your live site, not last week’s structure. IndexPlease keeps your XML sitemaps automatically synced every 24 hours, ensuring:
This daily sync avoids sending outdated signals to Google and keeps your crawl budget focused on fresh, valid pages. It works seamlessly across all your connected properties.
URLMonitor does not offer sitemap syncing or submission features. It tracks whether URLs from your sitemap remain indexed in Google and sends alerts if any drop off. However, it cannot push new sitemaps, remove old ones or resubmit content. The tool assumes your site’s submission system is already in place and focuses only on what happens after Google crawls and indexes your pages.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Daily Sitemap Sync | ✓ | ✘ |
Automatically Adds/Removes URLs | ✓ | ✘ |
Resubmits Sitemap to GSC | ✓ | ✘ |
Crawl Budget Optimization | ✓ | ✘ |
Ideal For | Dynamic content sites, large blogs, eCom | Monitoring sitemap-indexed URLs for drop-offs |
IndexPlease ensures Google gets a fresh sitemap daily.
URLMonitor lets you know if that sitemap actually got indexed.
Most SEOs forget: submitting a sitemap is just half the job, removing old or irrelevant ones is equally critical. IndexPlease gives you the power to delete outdated or broken sitemaps directly from Google Search Console via API.
Whether it’s leftover URLs from a site migration, deprecated product pages or category structures you no longer use, IndexPlease lets you keep your GSC account clean and your crawl paths optimized.
This avoids crawl waste, reduces index bloat and helps Google focus on what matters now, not what existed six months ago.
URLMonitor does not support deleting sitemaps via Google Search Console. The tool is strictly observational, it monitors URL status and indexing changes but provides no ability to alter sitemap structure, remove files from GSC or clean up deprecated content. Any sitemap-related maintenance must be handled manually outside the platform.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Delete Sitemaps via API | ✓ | ✘ |
GSC Cleanup Automation | ✓ | ✘ |
Helps Avoid Crawl Bloat | ✓ | ✘ |
Ideal Use Case | Post-migration, large eCom updates | Monitoring stale sitemap URLs manually |
Ideal For | Technical SEOs, site maintainers, agencies | Users needing notifications, not cleanup tools |
IndexPlease helps you maintain a lean, optimized crawl structure.
URLMonitor watches what happens, but doesn’t help you clean it up.
Not every page is created equal. A product launch? A Black Friday deal? A breaking news article?
With IndexPlease, you can flag specific URLs for priority indexing, telling Google: “this one first.”
This is especially powerful for:
IndexPlease prioritizes these URLs in your queue, so they’re pushed to Google ahead of lower-importance pages, using its direct integration with the Indexing API.
URLMonitor does not offer any indexing or submission controls, including priority handling. It monitors whether a page is indexed and how long it stays indexed, but does not allow you to influence the timing order or urgency of Google’s crawling behavior. If a high-value page isn’t picked up quickly, you’ll get an alert, but you’ll still need a tool like IndexPlease to fix it.
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Flag High-Value Pages | ✓ | ✘ |
Priority Submission Handling | ✓ | ✘ |
Fast Indexing for Campaign URLs | ✓ | ✘ |
API-Based Priority Indexing | ✓ | ✘ |
Ideal For | Marketers, publishers, SEOs with deadlines | Passive observers needing status visibility |
IndexPlease lets you control what gets indexed first.
URLMonitor just tells you whether it eventually did.
IndexPlease is a professional, API-based platform built for SEOs, marketers, agencies and site owners who need reliable, scalable indexing. Pricing is transparent and built to match usage intensity:
Plan | Price (Annual Billing) | Daily Indexing Limit | Sites Supported |
---|---|---|---|
Starter | $7/month | 400 URLs/day | 3 websites |
Growth | $17/month | 1,000 URLs/day | 10 websites |
Professional | $33/month | 2,000 URLs/day | 20 websites |
Enterprise | Custom | 2,000+ URLs/day | 20+ websites |
All plans include:
URLMonitor pricing starts at $9/month, scaling by the number of monitored pages and features. Plans typically include:
All plans include:
🔴 Missing from all plans:
Comparison Summary:
Feature | IndexPlease | URLMonitor |
---|---|---|
Free Plan | ✘ (Starts at $7) | ✘ |
Deindexing Support | ✘ | ✘ |
Built for Scaling | ✓ | ✓ (monitoring only) |
Smart Quota Allocation | ✓ | ✘ |
TXT Export & Analytics | ✓ | ✘ |
Priority Indexing Control | ✓ | ✘ |
Long-Term ROI | ✓ (automation + control) | Situational (monitoring-focused) |
Ideal For | Professionals, teams, agencies | SEOs monitoring performance, not triggering it |
URLMonitor is built for visibility and peace of mind.
IndexPlease is built for speed, scale and execution.
URLMonitor is an excellent tool for teams who want to observe their Google indexing status without making changes. It’s perfect for tracking when content drops out of Google’s index, catching unexpected status changes and receiving timely alerts. If your goal is monitoring at scale, it’s reliable and user-friendly.
But if you’re running serious content operations, working with clients or simply can’t afford to wait days (or weeks) for Google to notice your content, IndexPlease is the clear winner.
It goes beyond automation to give you:
Where URLMonitor helps you observe the problem, IndexPlease is built to solve it automatically.
Use Case | Recommended Tool |
---|---|
Auditing SEO elements | URLMonitor |
Daily, bulk or priority indexing | IndexPlease |
Managing multiple sites or clients | IndexPlease |
Tracking indexing errors + fixes | IndexPlease |
Deleting or syncing sitemaps | IndexPlease |
Growing a content-driven business | IndexPlease |
Stop hoping Google will find your content. Start controlling the process with automation, tracking and scale.
Start using IndexPlease and take back control of your indexing pipeline.
URLMonitor is a performance tracking tool that monitors whether your pages are indexed or not and sends alerts for status changes. IndexPlease is a full-scale indexing automation platform that not only tracks status but also submits, syncs and manages your indexing pipeline across Google.
No. URLMonitor can notify you of index drops or inclusion, but it doesn’t diagnose why a URL failed. IndexPlease offers deep diagnostics including soft 404s, canonical mismatches, crawl blocks and redirect errors.
No. URLMonitor tracks URLs already indexed, but it does not submit URLs or support bulk input for indexing purposes. IndexPlease allows unlimited manual or CSV uploads for bulk indexing with API tracking.
No. URLMonitor does not interface with your Google Search Console for sitemap management. IndexPlease supports full sitemap syncing and deletion directly through GSC API.
No. URLMonitor is designed to detect changes, not act on them. IndexPlease allows users to manually flag high-priority pages for faster submission and indexing.
IndexPlease. It enables per-site quota allocation, priority rules and indexing performance visibility per domain. URLMonitor supports multi-site tracking but treats all URLs equally without allocation logic.
No. URLMonitor currently does not offer downloadable logs. IndexPlease gives full export functionality by status type (indexed, pending, error) for SEO audits or reporting.
URLMonitor is great for SEOs who want passive visibility and alerts on Google indexing behavior. IndexPlease is ideal for those who need control, speed, quota management and actual indexing automation.
URLMonitor ’s starting plan is slightly more expensive than IndexPlease, but its capabilities are focused on monitoring. IndexPlease offers a deeper toolset at a lower entry price, making it better for teams executing indexing at scale.