Foudroyer vs. IndexPlease

Indexing delays are no longer just an inconvenience, they’re traffic killers. Whether you’re an SEO agency, content publisher or affiliate pro, your success depends on how fast Google sees your content.

Two tools offer help:

• Foudroyer: a powerful multi-engine indexing tool that supports Google, Bing, Yandex and Naver. It emphasizes fast indexing, keyword tracking and centralized SEO analytics, with a user-friendly setup.

• IndexPlease: a premium automation system built for scaling indexing operations with full control, deep API integration and multi-site flexibility.

But which one actually gets the job done? Let’s break it down.

Tool Philosophy: Execution vs Insight

Foudroyer positions itself as an all-in-one SEO indexer and tracker. It supports simultaneous indexing across Google, Bing, Yandex and Naver, while also offering keyword tracking and dashboard-level performance analytics. It’s built for those who want a broader, platform-agnostic indexing reach and real-time visibility into rankings.

IndexPlease takes it further with deeper control, API-based quota allocation, error tracking, TXT exports, sitemap cleanup and multi-site indexing, all built to scale with agency or enterprise workflows.

• Foudroyer casts a wider indexing net.
• IndexPlease offers laser-focused control where it matters most, Google Search.

1. Auto Index Site URLs

IndexPlease:

IndexPlease automates the indexing of your site’s URLs by directly integrating with Google’s Indexing API. Every day, it scans your site and automatically submits new and updated pages, no manual work, no copy-pasting into GSC and no crawling delays.

This daily automation ensures that Google is always aware of your most recent content, helping you stay competitive in fast-moving niches like eCommerce, affiliate SEO and content publishing.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer offers multi-engine auto indexing, allowing you to submit URLs not only to Google but also to Bing, Yandex and Naver. Its system monitors your sitemap, detects unindexed pages and submits them automatically based on your plan’s quota. However, it lacks granular features like smart quota distribution or API-based priority flags for time-sensitive URLs.

Comparison Summary:

If indexing delays are costing you clicks, traffic or revenue, IndexPlease gives you daily, verified indexing power that you can control. Foudroyer spreads your reach across platforms but doesn’t offer the same tactical depth for it.

2. Daily URL Monitoring

IndexPlease:

Indexing isn’t just about submitting URLs, it’s about knowing what actually got indexed. IndexPlease runs daily monitoring checks on every submitted URL. It tells you:

• Which URLs are indexed
• Which are pending
• Which encountered errors (like soft 404s, canonical conflicts or crawl blocks)

All this happens automatically, no need to manually audit your site or dig through Search Console.

This gives SEOs and site managers full visibility and control over their indexing pipeline, something Google Search Console doesn’t do natively at scale.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer tracks which URLs have been indexed across multiple search engines and logs their status in your unified dashboard. However, it does not provide granular error reporting such as soft 404s or canonical mismatches. Its primary focus is visibility, not diagnostic troubleshooting. You’ll see what’s indexed and where, but not why something might be missing.

Comparison Summary:

With IndexPlease, indexing becomes a trackable, reliable process, not a mystery. Foudroyer helps you monitor multiple search engines at once, but it won’t tell you what’s broken.

3. Submit Sitemaps to Google

IndexPlease:

Submitting your sitemap to Google once isn’t enough. IndexPlease automates this task daily, ensuring that all your updated URLs, including new pages, edits and deletions, are captured in real-time.

It connects directly with Google Search Console’s API, pushing your sitemap every 24 hours. This keeps your sitemap clean, current and fully in sync with what Google expects, without you lifting a finger.

This daily automation prevents issues like stale URLs, broken entries or missed updates, all of which can slow down indexing.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer offers automated sitemap parsing, which detects updated or new pages and submits them for indexing. While it supports syncing across multiple search engines, there’s no direct GSC sitemap deletion or selective sync management. It’s built for convenience, but lacks the depth of manual override or sitemap diagnostics if you need to fine-tune your crawl behavior.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer helps submit, but IndexPlease helps manage. If sitemap structure and crawl efficiency are part of your SEO strategy, IndexPlease offers far more control.

4. Provide URLs in TXT File

IndexPlease:

Every indexed, pending or errored URL in your account is stored and made available as a downloadable .txt file. With a single click, you can export lists of:

• Successfully indexed URLs
• URLs pending Google response
• URLs that encountered issues (like redirects, canonical conflicts, etc.)

This feature is especially valuable for agencies, developers and SEO teams who need clean URL data for audits, reporting or backup. It also streamlines integrations with other tools like Screaming Frog, GSC bulk uploads or analytics platforms.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer centralizes indexation and keyword performance data in its dashboard, but it currently does not offer downloadable .txt or .csv exports of indexed URL logs. You can monitor what’s happening across search engines, but you can’t extract or repurpose that data easily for client reports, offline QA or technical audits.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer gives you visibility, but IndexPlease gives you your data. If you’re running audits, generating reports or feeding other tools, exportability isn’t optional, it’s essential.

5. Divide Indexing Quota Across Multiple Sites

IndexPlease:

Unlike most indexing tools that treat your account as a single project, IndexPlease lets you smartly divide your daily indexing quota across multiple websites.

Whether you’re managing:

• A personal blog + a client eCom store
• 10 affiliate sites
• Or 20+ client properties through your agency

You can allocate how much of your indexing capacity goes to each domain, manually or dynamically. That means your high-priority sites always get more indexing coverage, while smaller or seasonal domains use less.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer supports multiple websites per plan (from 1 on the Starter plan to 100 on Enterprise), but it does not offer site-specific quota allocation or control. Indexing capacity is shared across all connected sites and there’s no dashboard for prioritizing URL volume by domain or project.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer supports volume, but IndexPlease supports strategy. When you need to control indexing flow across clients or projects, precision matters more than headcount.

6. Bulk Index Links

IndexPlease:

Need to index hundreds or even thousands of URLs at once? IndexPlease makes it effortless. With its Bulk Indexing feature, you can upload entire lists of URLs and submit them in a single batch, no limits, no API rate restrictions.

It’s built for real SEO workflows like:

• Post-migration indexing
• Large blog or product catalog updates
• Reindexing after canonical or URL structure fixes
• Client onboarding (indexing legacy pages fast)

Bulk submission is handled directly through Google’s Indexing API, ensuring speed and success tracking.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer supports daily indexing quotas based on your plan (ranging from 200 to 10,000 requests per day), but it does not offer a dedicated bulk upload interface. There is no CSV import or custom filtering per campaign. Indexing is automated behind the scenes via sitemap scanning and status checks, but lacks hands-on tools for SEOs managing structured batches.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer is great at background automation, but IndexPlease gives you tactical firepower. When you need precision at scale, IndexPlease is the tool built for the job.

7. Sync Sitemaps Daily

IndexPlease:

Your sitemap should reflect your live site, not last week’s structure. IndexPlease keeps your XML sitemaps automatically synced every 24 hours, ensuring:

• New pages are added
• Deleted URLs are removed
• URL changes, redirects and canonical shifts are updated

This daily sync avoids sending outdated signals to Google and keeps your crawl budget focused on fresh, valid pages. It works seamlessly across all your connected properties.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer includes automated sitemap syncing based on your plan, daily, twice per day or hourly. It scans for updated pages and submits them for indexing across Google, Bing, Yandex and Naver. However, there is no way to trigger a manual sync, selectively exclude pages or diagnose sitemap errors. The sync process is reliable, but it lacks flexibility for advanced SEO teams needing control.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer syncs automatically, but IndexPlease syncs intelligently. If you’re optimizing crawl efficiency and want full control, IndexPlease is the tool for the job.

8. Delete Sitemaps from Google

IndexPlease:

Most SEOs forget: submitting a sitemap is just half the job, removing old or irrelevant ones is equally critical. IndexPlease gives you the power to delete outdated or broken sitemaps directly from Google Search Console via API.

Whether it’s leftover URLs from a site migration, deprecated product pages or category structures you no longer use, IndexPlease lets you keep your GSC account clean and your crawl paths optimized.

This avoids crawl waste, reduces index bloat and helps Google focus on what matters now, not what existed six months ago.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer does not currently offer the ability to delete sitemaps from Google Search Console. While it can parse and sync XML sitemaps automatically, users must manually remove deprecated sitemaps from GSC if they want to optimize crawl behavior or eliminate outdated references.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer keeps adding, but IndexPlease knows when to clean up. If you’re serious about crawl health, manual deletion isn’t enough.

9. Index URLs on Priority

IndexPlease:

Not every page is created equal. A product launch? A Black Friday deal? A breaking news article?

With IndexPlease, you can flag specific URLs for priority indexing, telling Google: “this one first.”

This is especially powerful for:

• Time-sensitive promotions
• Updated service pages
• High-value blog content
• Client landing pages that can’t wait

IndexPlease prioritizes these URLs in your queue, so they’re pushed to Google ahead of lower-importance pages, using its direct integration with the Indexing API.

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer includes a feature called “Quick Index”, designed to accelerate indexing requests. However, it does not allow users to manually prioritize specific URLs. The system decides which unindexed URLs to submit based on sitemap activity and plan limits. There is no queue control or URL-specific priority logic, it’s automated, not tactical.

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer is fast, but IndexPlease is smart and fast. When your rankings depend on what gets indexed first, IndexPlease gives you full control.

Pricing & Value Comparison

IndexPlease:

IndexPlease is a professional, API-based platform built for SEOs, marketers, agencies and site owners who need reliable, scalable indexing. Pricing is transparent and built to match usage intensity:

All plans include:

• Unlimited total URLs
• Google Search Console syncing
• Daily automation
• Bulk submissions
• Index tracking, sitemap tools and priority indexing

Foudroyer:

Foudroyer offers four fixed plans, each targeting a different scale of SEO operation:

• Newbie (€9.99/month): 1 website, 200 indexations/day
• Professionals (€29.99/month): 10 websites, 400 indexations/day
• Teams (€49.99/month): 20 websites, 800 indexations/day
• Enterprise (€129.99/month): 100 websites, 10,000 indexations/day

All plans include:

• Multi-engine indexing (Google, Bing, Yandex, Naver)
• Automatic sitemap sync
• Dashboard analytics for keyword and URL performance
• Quick Indexing feature (auto-prioritization)
• SEO meta + Open Graph previews

🔴 Missing from all plans:

• Manual TXT export
• Smart quota sharing across sites
• Sitemap deletion
• Custom bulk uploads or campaign-level filters

Comparison Summary:

Foudroyer is great for cross-engine visibility, but IndexPlease is built to dominate Google Search at scale. If your business lives or dies on SERP timing and index control, IndexPlease delivers where it counts.

Final Verdict: Diagnostic Tools vs Indexing Execution

Foudroyer is a solid tool for SEOs looking for a multi-engine indexing solution with built-in analytics. It automates indexing across Google, Bing, Yandex and Naver, making it useful for global or multilingual site strategies. It’s clean, fast and simple to use.

But if you’re running serious content operations, working with clients or simply can’t afford to wait days (or weeks) for Google to notice your content, IndexPlease is the clear winner.

It goes beyond automation to give you:

• Manual control over quota
• Priority indexing for critical pages
• Smart multi-site support
• Daily monitoring with exportable reports
• Sitemap deletion and cleanup tools
• API-driven bulk indexing at scale

Where Foudroyer helps you observe the problem, IndexPlease is built to solve it automatically.

Ready to Index Like a Pro?

Stop hoping Google will find your content. Start controlling the process with automation, tracking and scale.

Start using IndexPlease and take back control of your indexing pipeline.

FAQs

1. What’s the main difference between Foudroyer and IndexPlease?

Foudroyer is a multi-engine SEO tool that automates indexing across Google, Bing, Yandex and Naver. It includes keyword tracking and analytics. IndexPlease, by contrast, is built specifically for Google indexing at scale, with advanced features like smart quota control, error diagnostics and priority indexing logic.

2. Can Foudroyer detect indexing errors like soft 404s or canonical issues?

No. Foudroyer shows which URLs are indexed but doesn’t provide detailed error reporting. IndexPlease reports granular indexing issues, including canonical mismatches, crawl blocks and soft 404s, enabling faster fixes.

3. Does Foudroyer support bulk URL uploads like IndexPlease?

No. Foudroyer works through automated sitemap scanning and quota-based submissions. IndexPlease allows unlimited manual or bulk CSV uploads, with Google Indexing API submission and tracking built-in.

4. Can I delete outdated sitemaps using Foudroyer?

No. Foudroyer does not support sitemap deletion via GSC. IndexPlease offers API-based sitemap cleanup, helping you avoid crawl waste and improve indexing focus.

5. Does Foudroyer allow URL-level priority indexing?

Not directly. Its “Quick Index” feature resubmits unindexed pages, but you can’t flag or reorder URLs for urgent indexing. IndexPlease lets you prioritize key pages, like launches or promotions, for faster crawl inclusion.

6. Which tool is better for multi-site management?

IndexPlease. You can assign quota per site, prioritize key domains and monitor each project separately. Foudroyer supports many websites per plan, but shares quota equally with no per-site control.

7. Can I export URL indexing logs from Foudroyer?

No. Foudroyer does not offer .txt or .csv export for indexed URLs. IndexPlease gives you full exportability by status (indexed, pending, errored), ideal for audits, clients or team reporting.

8. Who should use Foudroyer vs. IndexPlease?

Foudroyer is best for marketers seeking cross-engine indexing and centralized keyword tracking. IndexPlease is ideal for SEO professionals, agencies and large-scale content teams who need precise control, bulk uploads and fast Google indexing.

9. Is Foudroyer more affordable than IndexPlease?

Foudroyer has slightly lower starter pricing but is limited in flexibility. IndexPlease delivers stronger long-term ROI through automation depth, speed and visibility, especially when managing multiple domains or client projects.